Why the residents of the demolished properties were not entitled to the shared ownership of new properties
The process of urbanization has brought about a large number of legal issues concerning compensation for demolition and relocation, disputes over shared property housing, and disputes over property inheritance. It is important for interested parties to know the law, and rights and obligations involved to avoid potential disputes. In this case, our lawyers Sun Jing and Song Jing successfully represented the defendant to have won the support of the court.
Dispute regarding a minority shareholder applying to the court to dissolve the company
As a minority shareholder of Shaanxi Yixi Investment Management Co., Mr Zhao was dissatisfied with the company's dividend distribution mechanism and sued for compulsory dissolution of the company. Lawyer Wang Ruilin successfully represented Yixi Company, and was supported by the courts in the first-instance and second-instance as well as the trial supervision procedures of the Supreme People's Court, and Zhao's request was rejected. In the retrial ruling, the Supreme People's Court analyzed how to understand the conditions for applying judicial compulsory dissolution of a company.
Land lease contract disputes, construction land use right disputes, and loan contract disputes between a collective enterprise and it joint venture company
As a collectively owned enterprise, Kunshan Bleaching and Dyeing Factory (Kunshan) established a joint venture with a Hong Kong company to establish Kunshan Gaohong Textile Company. After more than 20 years of production and operation of the joint venture, Gao Hong requested Kunshan factory to repay two long-standing loans and their interest; Kunshan factory counterclaimed that Gao Hong should pay the land lease for using Kunshan's facilities for years. The two parties commenced several civil legal actions. Our Partner Wang Xin of successfully represented Gao Hong in most of its claims.
宋婧律师成功代理杭州固武公司买卖合同纠纷
上海青客设备租赁有限公司与杭州固武装饰材料有限公司存在买卖合同关系。固武公司通过青客公司的“工程抢单”软件承接青客业务，将货物送至其指定地点、在线交接后，青客出具账单、固武确认、青客支付。合作若干月之后，青客以工作人员离职为理由拒绝承认合同关系。宋婧律师成功代理固武公司追回货款。
吴立骏律师代理投资者诉方正证券虚假陈述责任纠纷
多位投资者在二级市场买入方正证券公司股票，后发现方正证券公司没有履行严格的信息披露义务，构成证券法意义上的“虚假陈述”，自己因其遭受损失。投资者获得一审法院、二审法院的支持。
普陀区基督教桃浦堂建设工程合同纠纷
上海天德建设（集团）公司承包了普陀区基督教堂桃浦堂的钟楼修缮工程，并签订了建设工程合同。在履约过程中，发包方和承包方对于工程进度、质量、工程款支付产生纠纷。东方剑桥律师事务所代理天德公司获得法院支持。
Client Won an Appeal against a Recovery Claim for Advance Payment
Shanghai Orient Cambridge Law Firm successfully represented the appellant in the appeal (the defendant in the first instance). A project manager made an advance payment "on behalf of his employer company", our client, to its contractor which was in financial difficulties, in order to ensure the construction work carried out as scheduled. Later, the employee tried to recover the payment from his employer and the contractor. The court of first instance gave the judgement to the claimant, whist Xinxiang Municipal Intermediate People's Court of Henan found there were insufficient evidence to support the employee's claim and therefore supported our client's appeal to have dismissed the employee's claim.
Contract Invalidity Dispute Case Supported by the Court of First Instance
The Court of First Instance supported the Plaintiff's claim, represented by us: The contents of the "Death Compensation Agreement" and the "Undertaking" signed with a property management company in Quanzhou regarding transferring the right to claim for the group's personal accident insurance claims are invalid.
肖万华律师、徐杰律师代理加拿大公司国际货物买卖合同案终审胜诉
加拿大英菲尼公司聘请上海市东方剑桥律师事务所主任肖万华律师、徐杰律师处理与上海伊兆公司买卖合同纠纷案件。二审法院经审理，维持一审判决、支持加拿大公司要求伊兆公司返还货款的诉讼请求。
代理上海拓阔企业与郑某借款合同纠纷获法院支持
上海拓阔企业与被告郑某借款合同纠纷一案，上海市杨浦区人民法院于2019年6月3日受理，并根据原告提出的财产保全申请，作出裁定并采取保全措施；并于8月29日做出一审判决，判令被告郑某支付原告借款本金及利息。